MetaHate: A Dataset for Unifying Efforts on Hate Speech Detection
This is MetaHate: a meta-collection of 36 hate speech datasets from social media comments.
What's New in Version 2.0
- Data Refinement and Size Adjustment: The original publication reported 1,226,202 total instances and 1,101,165 public instances. Due to refined cross-dataset deduplication and overlapping instance resolution, the current dataset sizes are 1,226,203 (full) and 1,084,236 (public).
- Expanded Metadata: Added
dataset,source(platform), andsplitinformation to provide deeper context for each post. - Original ID Mapping: Included
original_idto trace posts back to their raw source datasets where available.
Dataset Structure
The original dataset described in the accompanying paper contained 1,226,202 social media posts. Following the Version 2.0 refinement, the current total is 1,226,203 posts in a TSV file. Each element contains the following fields:
| Field Name | Type | Possible Values | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | str | any | Unique internal identifier for the MetaHate dataset. |
| original_id | str | any, null | Identifier from the original source dataset (if available). |
| label | int | 0, 1 | 0 for non-hate speech, 1 for hate speech. |
| text | str | any | Social media post text. Each post is unique across the collection. |
| dataset | str | hateval_2019, etc. | The specific source dataset the post originates from. |
| source | str | twitter, reddit, etc. | The social media platform where the post was published. |
| split | str | train, test, mini-metahate-distil-train, mini-metahate-eval | MetaHate splits. |
Source mapping
| Dataset Key | Original Research Paper / Source |
|---|---|
| hate_offensive_2017 | Davidson et al. (2017): Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language |
| ENCASE_2018 | Founta et al. (2018): Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviour |
| supremacist_2018 | Gibert et al. (2018): Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum |
| online_harassment_2017 | Golbeck et al. (2017): A Large Human-Labeled Corpus for Online Harassment Research |
| hate_speech_A_2016 | Waseem (2016): Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? |
| hate_speech_B_2016 | Waseem and Hovy (2016): Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? |
| hateval_2019 | Basile et al. (2019): SemEval-2019 Task 5 |
| OLID_2019 | Zampieri et al. (2019): Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media |
| TRAC1_2018 | Kumar et al. (2018): Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Data |
| TRAC2_2020 | Bhattacharya et al. (2020): Developing a Multilingual Annotated Corpus of Misogyny and Aggression |
| #metooma_2020 | Gautam et al. (2020): #MeTooMA: Multi-Aspect Annotations of Tweets |
| curated_hate_speech_2023 | Mody, Huang, and de Oliveira (2023): A curated dataset for hate speech detection |
| hugging_face | Roshan Sharma and Ali Toosi (Hugging Face) |
| hatecomments_2023 | Gupta, Priyadarshi, and Gupta (2023): Hateful Comment Detection and Hate Target-Type Prediction |
| kaggleA / B / etc. | Kaggle (Albright, SR, Jigsaw) |
| HASOC_2019 | Mandl et al. (2019): Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019 |
| bullydetect_2018 | Bin Abdur Rakib and Soon (2018): Using the Reddit Corpus for Cyberbully Detection |
| MLMA_2019 | Ousidhoum et al. (2019): Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis |
| hateful_tweets_2022 | Albanyan and Blanco (2022): Pinpointing Fine-Grained Relationships between Hateful Tweets and Replies |
| multiclass_hatespeech_2022 | Toraman, Şahinuç, and Yilmaz (2022): Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfer |
| measuring_hate_speech_2020_2022 | Kennedy et al. (2022) / Sachdeva et al. (2022): The Measuring Hate Speech Corpus |
| call_me_sexist_but_2021 | Samory et al. (2020): The ‘Call me sexist, but’ sexism dataset |
| us_2020_elections | Grimminger and Klinger (2021): Hate Towards the Political Opponent |
| toxic_spans_2021 | Pavlopoulos et al. (2021): SemEval-2021 Task 5 |
| hatexplain_2020 | Mathew et al. (2020): HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection |
| slur_corpus_2020 | Kurrek, Saleem, and Ruths (2020): Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy for Online Slur Usage |
| CAD_2021 | Vidgen et al. (2021): Introducing CAD: the Contextual Abuse Dataset |
| gab_hate_corpus_2022 | Kennedy et al. (2018): Introducing the Gab Hate Corpus |
| intervene_hate_2019 | Qian et al. (2019): A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speech |
| exmachina_2016 | Wulczyn, Thain, and Dixon (2016): Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale |
| ethos_2022 | Mollas et al. (2020): ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset |
| context_toxicity_2020 | Pavlopoulos et al. (2020): Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter? |
| hate_online_news_media_2018 | Salminen et al. (2018): Anatomy of Online Hate |
| hate_speech_data_2017 | Mondal et al. (2017) / Silva et al. (2016): A Measurement Study of Hate Speech |
| jigsaw_toxic | Jigsaw Toxic Comment Classification Challenge |
Usage
In order to use MetaHate you need to agree to our Terms and Conditions. Access to the complete meta-collection (1,226,202) will be granted only upon the submission of all relevant agreements for the derived datasets. Otherwise, we will only provide the access to the publicly available datasets (1,101,165 instances).
To access the full data, we require the original Terms of Use of the following works:
- A Large Labeled Corpus for Online Harassment Research (Golbeck et al. 2017)
- The 'Call me sexist but' Dataset (Samory et al. 2021)
- Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on Twitter (Waseem 2016)
- Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter (Waseem and Hovy 2016)
- Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Data (Kumar et al. 2018)
- #MeTooMA: Multi-Aspect Annotations of Tweets Related to the MeToo Movement (Gautam et al. 2020)
- Pinpointing Fine-Grained Relationships between Hateful Tweets and Replies (Albanyan and Blanco 2022)
- Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfer (Toraman, Şahinuç, and Yilmaz 2022)
- Developing a Multilingual Annotated Corpus of Misogyny and Aggression (Bhattacharya et al. 2020)
Send these agreements to paloma.piot@udc.es to access the full data.
Disclaimer
This dataset includes content that may contain hate speech, offensive language, or other forms of inappropriate and objectionable material. The content present in the dataset is not created or endorsed by the authors or contributors of this project. It is collected from various sources and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the project maintainers.
The purpose of using this dataset is for research, analysis, or educational purposes only. The authors do not endorse or promote any harmful, discriminatory, or offensive behaviour conveyed in the dataset.
Users are advised to exercise caution and sensitivity when interacting with or interpreting the dataset. If you choose to use the dataset, it is recommended to handle the content responsibly and in compliance with ethical guidelines and applicable laws.
The project maintainers disclaim any responsibility for the content within the dataset and cannot be held liable for how it is used or interpreted by others.
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite the following reference:
@article{Piot_Martín-Rodilla_Parapar_2024,
title={MetaHate: A Dataset for Unifying Efforts on Hate Speech Detection},
volume={18},
url={https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/31445},
DOI={10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31445},
abstractNote={Hate speech represents a pervasive and detrimental form of online discourse, often manifested through an array of slurs, from hateful tweets to defamatory posts. As such speech proliferates, it connects people globally and poses significant social, psychological, and occasionally physical threats to targeted individuals and communities. Current computational linguistic approaches for tackling this phenomenon rely on labelled social media datasets for training. For unifying efforts, our study advances in the critical need for a comprehensive meta-collection, advocating for an extensive dataset to help counteract this problem effectively. We scrutinized over 60 datasets, selectively integrating those pertinent into MetaHate. This paper offers a detailed examination of existing collections, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the existing datasets, paving the way for training more robust and adaptable models. These enhanced models are essential for effectively combating the dynamic and complex nature of hate speech in the digital realm.},
number={1},
journal={Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media},
author={Piot, Paloma and Martín-Rodilla, Patricia and Parapar, Javier},
year={2024},
month={May},
pages={2025-2039}
}
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the funding from the Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 101073351. The authors also thank the financial support supplied by the Consellería de Cultura, Educación, Formación Profesional e Universidades (accreditation 2019-2022 ED431G/01, ED431B 2022/33) and the European Regional Development Fund, which acknowledges the CITIC Research Center in ICT of the University of A Coruña as a Research Center of the Galician University System and the project PID2022-137061OB-C21 (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Proyectos de Generación de Conocimiento; supported by the European Regional Development Fund). The authors also thank the funding of project PLEC2021-007662 (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia, Unión Europea-Next Generation EU).
- Downloads last month
- 80