A
I don't know if it's even true that it's always unanimous because I thought there were cases where, uh, I don't know if it's the difference between felonies and misdemeanors, but where it was okay for a state to have it like eleven out of twelve. 
B
Yeah, I actually thought I'd read that, too and that's why I phrased it that way.
A
Yeah.
B
I wonder, the difference, yeah, the difference could be that for, uh, state, if there is such a thing, state felonies versus federal felonies that federal, things that are under federal jurisdiction require the unanimous vote, and things that are under state jurisdiction, even criminal don't require, but I don't know what the, the laws, do you think that that's an unreasonable, uh, requirement that they be unanimous?
A
Well, I'd be curious as to what the, uh, requirement for a, an acquittal is. And I, I don't think it would be wrong to say that eleven out of twelve can convict if there were something corresponding saying that if, you know, six or seven voted not guilty, then instead of it being a hung jury, that was an acquittal. But I don't know whether you need an, a unanimous, uh, vote of not guilty to acquit.
B
Yeah, that, that would be an interesting change. It was also allow the, uh, idea that if you had one person who was, uh, very disagreeable that, I mean, it, it fundamentally changes the way the processing occurs because, uh, the fact that it's w-, the, the principle is that the fact that it's unanimous insures the beyond a reasonable doubt, uh, criterion that it, uh, increases the, the likelihood of getting the proper judgment. So, I, I think, if anything, it would have to be a very close to unanimous decision.