B
Um, and I think that there, it's important to have a jury, but I think the way that they go through so much time to get it a fair one. That's okay too. As long as it's not used to delay the trial so much. They need to have a fair jury but they only w, you know, would cover fif-, forty-nine percent of the decision or fifty percent and then the two judges would go ahead and make the final decision.
A
Well,
B
How do you feel about that?
A
I hadn't, uh, thought of it from that point of view before. I have been in a fairly important trial, and, uh, what bothers me is I was concerned of the ability of some of the people in the jury to adequately understand --
B
Right.
A
-- what was being presented so that they themselves could make a proper and, uh, accurate decision. That's the part that bothered me about it. Um, I really think that the, the, the jury ought to have more say so in the selection or in the determination of whether they are guilty or not. But I also think that the jury should be, uh, very, very, uh, carefully, more carefully selected to make sure that they are entirely intel, intelligent people and that they understand some of the details that are involved so that they can make accu, accurate decisions.