A
Okay, uh, let's see, I, I believe in the trial by jury. I think if it was up to the judge alone that there would be real possible for, uh, payoffs, you know, briberies, uh, unfairness, one-sidedness, you know, all those kinds of things. And I also like the unanimous decision because you have to persuade everybody to be a hundred percent, absolutely sure before you convict somebody. I, I really agree with the, uh, innocent until proven guilty theory. I think that's, that's a good way to do it. That's about all.
B
Well, I think, I think basically we're in a lot of agreement, uh, in that I certainly agree that for any case involving serious injury to another person then maybe that needs, uh, some kind of legal definition.
A
Uh-huh.
B
But for anything involving that, trial by jury certainly should be mandatory.
A
Uh-huh.
B
But there should be with our overworked, uh, judicial system, it seems to me like there ought to be a means of, of, um, not having to take everything before a full court. You know, maybe there ought to be some kind of, of, uh, MUMBLEx isn't there a type of word called a jury duty now.